Allow me to get briefly political and weigh in on the current chaos and upheaval happening up on Parliament Hill.
As most of you know, the Liberals, NDP and the BQ have signed a coalition pact. And it would seem that since you’ve heard of it, very few of you are happy about it. And to you I say…educate yourself and please stop your griping. You cannot have it both ways. You can’t be proud and privileged to live in a Democracy and then start complaining when it functions in a way it’s allowed to but that you don’t like. You can’t pick and choose.
In the last election (which was far from necessary to begin with since our esteemed leader decided to break his own law to call one earlier then was legally mandated), the Canadian people elected a minority government. And although the “minority” piece was stressed left, right and center by the media following the outcome, it would seem very few people actually understand what that means. So let me enlighten:
In a minority government, the largest party wins only a plurality of seats and thus must constantly bargain for support from other parties in order to pass legislation and avoid being defeated on motions of no confidence. Most minority governments have lasted less than two years. The average duration of a minority government in Canada is approximately 1 year, 4 months.
So here’s the thing, people…that’s what we elected. A minority. And unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your viewpoint), it means wheeling and dealing is the name of the game and it means that currently, the Conservatives aren’t playing the game to win. They aren’t reaching across the aisle and making the deals necessary to keep things status quo.
And to all the people voicing anger along the lines of “how can they go against the voting public? we elected the Conservatives!” or “this is a democracy, how can they do this? who do they think they are?”…the answers are they are constitutionally allowed to do it, we elected not just Conservatives to government, but every other person in that legislature and they are all there to represent the people of Canada. THAT is democracy at work. Or to quote Nelson Wiseman, political science professor at the University of Toronto, who puts it better then my babble ever could:
Elections don’t elect governments, they elect Parliaments. Parliaments make a government. Parliaments can break a government.
So this is actually your votes at work…they aren’t doing anything illegal, they aren’t doing anything wrong, and they aren’t doing something that will destroy our country. This is part of a functioning parliament and just because it happens rarely, doesn’t mean it’s a negative occurrence. I mean it is a bad thing if you’re a big supporter of the Conservative agenda, but as a leader in a parliamentary system, Harper should be bowing to the opinions of the voting public’s representatives. That is to say he should not be harnessing the opinions of the same voting public pissed off at a process they don’t understand after the fact and he should not be trying to campaign for support with the public by using inaccurate ads seemingly created by a team of people only peripherally aware of parliamentary procedures and Canadian governmental laws. The public elected more representatives from other parties then they did from the Conservatives and those other elected officials don’t believe the Conservatives are what will help our country at this point in time, so they are using their elected power (which we gave them) to do something about it. And I say go for it. Nothing else is working and that financial plan was ridonkulously missing anything even resembling a financial plan…so let’s try something else.
Do I think a coalition is ideal? No…a government working together in the best interests of the country is ideal. But that ain’t happening with those we’ve recently (again) elected, no matter their party affiliation…so I say any government cooperation is better than none.
It’s worked in Australia, the UK (in times of crisis only), the Nordic countries, the Benelux countries, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Turkey, Israel, Pakistan and India. Switzerland has been ruled by a loose coalition of the four strongest parties in parliament since 1959, called the “Magic Formula”. and it even worked in Canada when the conscription issue brought about a coalition government under Robert Borden back in 1917 (and coincidentally led to the formation of the Conservative Party…let’s all say it together…IRONY).
Many countries only resort to coalitions (the UK being an example) when times are tough. Well, guess what peeps, times is tough and they ain’t getting any easier. It’s time for a shake up and I have to admit to being excited about what change this could bring about. Many people are worried that such a turn of events will halt our countries fiscal momentum and create a weaker reputation around the world as they look to our uneven leadership. But how is that even possible when there is no momentum to speak of (the dollar has been in a backward slide for most of the year) and how can our reputation get weaker then it already is? Canada is the global afterthought…the perpetual wallflower…and none of our current leaders are strong enough to change that, together or as individuals. And how can any country around the world judge us for a coalition when most countries have had similar groups in place?
The Conservatives played their finance card but miscalculated on how much they could push through at once, given the current economic climate. They gambled by proposing a three-year ban on the right of civil servants to strike and limits on the ability of women to sue for pay equity and eliminated subsidies for political parties and they lost…again, a part of our system at work. How that system starts to build itself back up again is really in the hands of the Governor General. She will decided where we go next…
If it is a coalition, I’m the first to agree with people who think Dion will not make a strong leader…I wish they had agreed on someone else, but as the head of the Liberals (until May), he’s what we’ve got. And do I like that the BQ are involved? Not particularly…but here’s the thing, they are a national party like it or not and as long as they are, they’re involved. And I should stress that they are involved as a supporter of the coalition until 2010, not as an actual part of the coalition itself. And lord knows they’ve held the balance of power before for both sides of the spectrum (Grits and Cons), so this is definitely nothing new…and dealing with the largely seperatist party does not make anyone “unpatriotic”. And while politicians are never without ulterior motives or questionable methods, the fact that this deal was brokered by Chretien and Broadbent means that I have way more faith in this succeeding and acting as something that will propel this country in the direction it needs to be. Duceppe, Layton and Dion (and all their back room dealers) are not the best leaders our country has ever seen but they are extremely intelligent men whose policies really do mirror each other. So I say give them a chance before deriding them and stoning them…they have a right within our system to try what they think is best. If it is best, remains to be seen, but I am sure as hell willing to give it a try…especially if it means not spending $250 million dollars on yet another election (which would be necessary if they went the “no confidence” route…)
If nothing else, the political geek in me is fascinated to seen what happens.
Bring it on, Canada…who’s boring now, eh?

Wow!! That is a very long rant. Good job.
I love Emma!
While it might be legal and what not the fact that we have just come out of an election to be plunged into the middle of this mess is BS. Sure Harper may have brought this on himself, but Layton’s an opportunist who as we have found out had this plan all along. If they were really doing this for the good of the country they would have formed a coalition BEFORE the election and not afterwards. Bring this on in the middle of an economic crisis shows just how little regard they have for the people they supposedly represent.
@Mark – I actually don’t completely disagree…I’d be much happier if we could scrap all the leaders and start again. However, I’d much rather a coalition then another costly election or a government in complete deadlock. I’m sure if Harper had put off the election to when it should’ve been held, we would’ve seen this happen now anyhow or at least when the official budget came down since Harper wasn’t going to reach across the aisle for support and the other 3 parties weren’t going to agree to a vote of confidence. If his financial plan was any indication, Flaherty (and by extension Harper) isn’t thinking of the Canadian people either. So I guess for me it comes down to the fact a) it’s part of the system and legit and b) if no one is putting Canada first, I’d rather have those more likely to pass legilation that would help those of us who need it and not those who don’t in power. The first reason is the Poli Sci nerd in me, then second is just me being selfish
Also? Isn’t opportunist just another word meaning politician? I kind of assume those motivations unless they prove otherwise
http://www.gopetition.com/online/23806.html CANADIAN TRANSPARENT GOVERNING BODY
I to have been caught in the political ping-pong game of our so-called democratic elections. I was born and raised in Toronto and hate to admit that since the Tredeau days, I have pretty much given up on the idea of democracy.
Now, Michaelle Jean, our Governera General, will have the difficult task of playing a mediator role (Canada cannot, should not be without a governing body). But unlike most mediators, she has only one week to hear all sides of our mud-slinging, politically elite’s high-school antics and best decide what would be best for Canada, with the Queen’s blessings I have been led to believe. She has access to the highest advisors in all fields she may find necessary to consult with.
What bothers me the most about all the media and public attention this situation is generating, seems to me that most forget what triggered this event. The Liberals, NDP and Bloc didn’t just decide to form a coalition one day because they had nothing better to do. Harper in one of his most underhanded and seditious attacks on Canadian Democracy to date tried to all but eliminate the opposition parties. Harper took control of the government in the manner of a high-school bully as if he had a strong majority rather than a weak minority.
“The opposition parties all say Flaherty’s mini-budget, which strictly limits federal spending, bans public-sector strikes through 2011″….banning public-sector eh, our politically elite trying to sneak that into effect sorta like the martial law the Americans had thrown at them.
A combative Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said Friday the government won’t back down on a single measure, despite the opposition threats.
Heck, give them their coalition (Dion will be replaced) but only if they agree to tax-payers conditions:
1. there cannot be another election for three years, tax-payers reserve the right to vote on issues
2. they implement a complete transparent government including expenditures (GOOGLE FOR GOVERNMENT)
3. they all work together to clean up or economy, medical system, educational system, garbage problem and implement ways to make Canada green again. Unemployment and poverty would would be minimal as every Canadian would need to be involved in some way, hence being compensated by the some 50% taxes taken from every employed person. I believe it’s time our government became just that, ours.
BANS PUBLIC-SECTOR FROM STRIKING UP UNTIL 2011…..THEY ARE GOING TO BAN THE TAXPAYERS FROM STRIKING AGAINST FLAHERTY’S BUDGET….THIS IS DEMORACY?????????…WE NEED TRANSPARENT GOVERNMENTING
Well Written. I have been trying to tell people this from the begining og this whole so called “crisis.”
That said it falls on deaf ears as half of Canadians (51%) Believe the Prime Minister is Directly Elected by Voters and Three in Four (75%) Don’t Know Who Canada’s Head of State Is. (http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/pressrelease.cfm?id=4208)